Comments on: Fresh Installment: Microsoft® Expression® Web Designer

By: Dell Latitude E6500 Akku

Dell Latitude E6500 Akku — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:11:50 +0000

die kommende dell xps 15 akku Windows-8-Plattform wow power leveling und alle Änderungen

By: Garry William Keen

Garry William Keen — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:57:27 +0000

I think your comments are very well thought out and delivered, I was going to upgade VS 2003 to 2005. So I could use it with Expression web which I do like a lot, but it will not install on Vista ultimate x64 which I find annoying. Yes I have been told it will if I do this or that, but then Vista says not working with no solution availible.

By: Nate K

Nate K — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:31:15 +0000

Personally, I have not used it – but it doesn’t look completely promising. I would say the same about dreamweaver, I think its ’sophisticated css-based layouts’ are crap. Sure, they might work – but they are littered with divs an spans all over the place to get the job done. How is this any better than tables or using font tags all over the place? Using CSS to your advantage means using it in a professional manner, understanding the DOM, inheritance and cascade. Otherwise, the code becomes just as bloated as if you were using tables. I don’t care how sophisticated a program gets, it will never be smart enough to create complex CSS based layouts.

Standards based? By whos definition? Microsoft? If so – that’s bad news. I would be interested to hear more about what is entailed with ’standards based’ development. Again, I fail to put my trust in a program to make a site complete accessible (without bloat or misconceptions).

I would be interested to hear more about what you have to say after using it over time (maybe even see some of the code it puts out)…

Thanks for the heads up!